CAEP Accountability Measures
The Elementary Education program at Southern New Hampshire University has been awarded TEAC accreditation for a seven-year term from December 2016 to December 2023 by the Inquiry Brief Commission of the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). Please access the following documents by clicking on the hyperlinks: Summary of the Case; Decision Letter. In 2023, SNHU will be reviewed for initial programs aligned with the new CAEP standards.
CAEP has four annual accountability measures which are used to provide information to students and stakeholders regarding Southern New Hampshire University’s undergraduate and graduate education programs. These measures support all parts of SNHU’s accreditation process for educator preparation programs.
Following is the list of the CAEP accountability measures with links to data tables that provide supporting evidence for each component:
CAEP Accountability Measures (for CHEA Requirements)
- Measure 1 (Initial): Completer effectiveness. (R4.1) Data must address: (a) completer impact in contributing to P-12 student-learning growth AND (b) completer effectiveness in applying professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions.
SNHU has developed a case study approach to review program completer(s) from the past three years. One case study was done for the 2020-2021 academic school year to pilot the new process.
CASE STUDY – Data will be available during the summer of 2022.
In addition to the case study, a survey of school administrators was conducted to solicit feedback relative to preparedness and effectiveness of SNHU graduates employed within their schools and districts and hired within the last three years. This data is shared internally and externally with stakeholders to review, identify and analyze the impact that program completers have on P-12 student learning across the InTASC standards, including professional knowledge, skills and dispositions.
- Measure 2 (Initial and Advanced): Satisfaction of employers and stakeholder involvement. (R4.2 | R5.3 | RA4.1) Data provided should be collected on employers’ satisfaction with program completers.
Each year, representatives from Academic Quality, Accreditation and Support (AQAS) and the Office of Educator Preparation (OEP) collect data from the school administrators supervising teachers who are in the first three years of teaching in the state of New Hampshire. This survey provides data relative to their satisfaction with educators who completed a Southern New Hampshire University’s education preparation program. This data is collected annually for initial licensure programs and shared internally and externally.
The Initial Licensure Advisory Board is comprised of EPP faculty, representatives from both the Office of Educator Preparation and the Office of Academic Quality, Accreditation and Support, as well as P-12 partners. The roles of the P-12 partners include both administrators and teachers. The Board meets a minimum of twice a year, while subsets of this group meet periodically throughout the year as the need arises. This group reviews performance data from the previous year, evaluation tools, and feedback collected from candidates and school district partners. They also review the structure and content of clinical experiences and suggest any potential revisions to curriculum or clinical experiences to the EPP faculty.
- Measure 3 (Initial and Advanced): Candidate competency at completion. (R3.3) Data provided should relate to measures the EPP is using to determine if candidates are meeting program expectations and ready to be recommended for licensure. (e.g.: EPP’s Title II report, data that reflect the ability of EPP candidates to meet licensing and state requirements or other measures the EPP uses to determine candidate competency at completion.)
The Office of Educator Preparation (OEP) reviews all candidate’s competencies at completion to ensure all university program requirements have been met before recommending them to the New Hampshire Department of Education for licensure.
Comprehensive Clinical Inventory (CCI): The CCI has been designed to provide feedback on the progress of individual teaching candidates who are completing their clinical practice/student teaching experience in their teacher preparation program. This performance-based assessment measures key competencies aligned to the 2022 revised CAEP standards, the 2011 InTASC standards, and the New Hampshire standards that are required of all teaching candidates prior to being recommended for certification. This standards-based observational instrument specifies the defining set of competencies that pre-service teachers should demonstrate before being recommended for certification in their states.
NH Teacher Candidate Assessment of Performance (NH TCAP): The capstone critical task for all candidates for initial licensure is the NH Teacher Candidate Assessment of Performance (NH TCAP). This is completed during a candidate’s culminating clinical experience. This summative performance assessment aligns with all four InTASC categories and provides evidence of a candidate’s ability to demonstrate those required competencies.
Title II Reports: Title II of the Higher Education Act requires education preparation programs to submit annual reports on the quality of teacher preparation in initial teacher licensure programs.
- Title II Reports: Teacher Preparation Data
- Measure 4 (Initial and Advanced): Ability of completers to be hired (in positions for which they have prepared.)
Each year, representatives from Academic Quality, Accreditation and Support (AQAS) and the Office of Education Preparation (OEP) provide data based on the number of completers by program for the Title II requirement of the Higher Education Act.
- State licensure exam results:
- Academic Year 2020-2021 (Summary Pass Rate 2020-2021 | Single Assessment Pass Rate 2020-2021)
- Academic Year 2019-2020 (Summary Pass Rate 2019-2020 | Single Assessment Pass Rate 2019-2020)
- Academic Year 2018-2019 (Summary Pass Rate 2018-2019 | Single Assessment Pass Rate 2018-2019)
- Academic Year 2017-2018 (Summary Pass Rate 2017-2018 | Single Assessment Pass Rate 2017-2018)
- Academic Year 2016-2017 (Summary Pass Rate 2016-2017 | Single Assessment Pass Rate 2016-2017)